In an unprecedented move, both the Afghan government and the Taliban have declared temporary ceasefires during the upcoming Eid al-Fitr holiday that marks the end of Ramadan. The Afghan government first declared its intent to cease offensive operations from June 12th until the end of Ramadan last week, presumably as part of President Ghani’s attempts to build on his peace initiative unveiled earlier this year.
More surprisingly, Taliban leaders responded two days later by announcing their own ceasefire, which will last from the 15th to the 18th of June. Much like the Afghan government’s ceasefire, which excludes “foreign” militant groups such as ISIL-KP, the Taliban’s truce does not extend to that group, or to the U.S.-led NATO forces backing the Afghan government. Nevertheless, this is the first time in the Afghan conflict that either side have ever agreed to a ceasefire, and so can only be regarded as a positive step as a result.
Political obstacles still abound
With a formal ceasefire by both sides being without historical precedent, there are those both in the Afghan government and the Taliban leadership who feel that these declarations are dangerous and misguided. That the Taliban are seemingly gaining the upper hand in the conflict gives plenty of reason for their commanders to see this as blunting their momentum. For Afghan Army commanders, ceasing operations while the Taliban are on the offensive and gaining increasing levels of control across the country means effectively ceding the initiative to them.
Beyond that, the war economy which commanders on both sides profit from give added incentives to oppose the truce. Whether the ceasefire can be maintained over the stated periods will be a significant test for how much loyalty the political leadership on both sides command among their officers and front-line soldiers.
However, if these obstacles are overcome, this could become a crucial trust-building exercise which can be built on and help prove the political value of the peace initiative going forward. According to an Afghan official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, the government is also willing to extend the ceasefire, so long as the Taliban continue to abide by its terms, a move that would be highly popular among war-weary Afghan citizens, well as a number of interested foreign governments, especially China (who is seeking to integrate Afghanistan into its One Belt One Road initiative).
Violence still likely
However encouraging, the talk of a temporary ceasefire will almost certainly be correlated with an immediate increase in violence, as commanders move to obtain advantages and establish control before the ceasefire is due to start. ISIL-KP will also no doubt see this as an opportunity to carry out further attacks and also appeal to Taliban commanders who are opposed to the truce. If the truce does not extend past Eid al-Fitr, it is also reasonable to assume an up-tick in violence will follow.
Marc Simms is an occasional blogger for Proelium Law LLP. Marc holds a MLitt in Terrorism Studies and a Masters in International Relations, both from St Andrews. His particular interests are in emerging international security issues, unconventional warfare and terrorism.
If you’d like further information, or to discuss working with us, you can get in touch via our Contact Us page
Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing are two subjects often linked but misunderstood.
Some quick distinctions to understand - the activity of money laundering is where cash raised from criminal activities is made to look legitimate and re-used in the financial system.
The activity of terrorist financing is less focused on the source of the funds, but interested in what those funds are used for.
The Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Terrorist Financing (CTF) legislation is important to your business, particularly if your business is engaged in legitimate activities in overseas or high risk jurisdictions. In the UK for instance you need to establish if Money Laundering Regulations apply to your business or not. See here for guidance.
Importantly, on 10th January 2020, new legislation was enacted in UK in the form of the 5th EU AML Directive. Amongst other areas, brings cyptocurrency into the purview of legislation and places obligations on business owners to make checks in respect of identifying beneficial owners and when enhanced due diligence is required. For the legislation click here. For a easier to understand guide click here.
What do I need to do ?
Making sure you know the source of any funds and where any funds you are giving out are going, is very important. Ensure you have a due diligence process in place if you are engaging with local suppliers and check the backgrounds of locally employed staff. You can only do so much to ensure you don't fall foul of the legislation but remember - the UK legislation has extra territorial reach, which means as a UK firm operating in a foreign country, you could still be prosecuted for offences under the legislation in UK. See here for guidance
The issues raised here may seem somewhat off putting for you to even engage in business. Ensuring you comply with the requirements (or at least establishing whether you need to) and then implementing systems to do so, will be a huge boost to your company management systems.